Reviewed by the BJJ Sportswear Editorial Team for technical accuracy and kept current.
No, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu is not an Olympic sport — and the "Jiu Jitsu" you might have seen at the World Games is a completely different discipline. Here is the real story.

No — Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu is not currently an Olympic sport. It does not appear on the official Olympic programme. It will not be at the LA 2028 Games either. That's the short answer. The longer answer is more interesting, and more hopeful for the sport, than a flat no suggests.
The biggest source of confusion here trips up even serious fans. You'll sometimes see "Jiu Jitsu" or "Ju-Jitsu" listed at events like the World Combat Games or the World Games. That is not Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.
That listing refers to Sports Ju-Jitsu. It's governed by the Ju-Jitsu International Federation (JJIF) — a separate discipline entirely, mixing striking, throwing, and groundwork. It has its own uniform, its own rules, and its own governing body. Beyond the name, it has nothing in common with a BJJ competition.
| Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) | Sports Ju-Jitsu (JJIF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Governing body | [IBJJF](https://ibjjf.com/rules/), ADCC | Ju-Jitsu International Federation |
| Format | Ground grappling, submissions only | Striking + throwing + groundwork |
| Uniform | Gi or rash guard/shorts | Traditional martial arts uniform |
| Olympic status | Not included | Part of World Games programme |
| Competition style | Points + submission | Knockout/submission + judges |
When you see "Jiu Jitsu" on a World Games schedule, that's Sports Ju-Jitsu. When you watch Gordon Ryan or Tainan Dalpra compete, that's BJJ. They share a name and almost nothing else at the competitive level.
The IOC checks sports against several criteria before adding them. BJJ's results here are mixed.
A single recognized governing body. The sport needs one global federation the IOC recognizes. BJJ's structure is split up — the IBJJF is the largest body, but ADCC, UAEJJF, and dozens of regional organizations all run independently. The IOC strongly prefers one unified structure. This has historically been BJJ's biggest barrier.
Global participation. BJJ clears this easily. It's practiced in over 100 countries. This is not the problem.
Anti-doping compliance. All Olympic sports must meet WADA standards. IBJJF has added drug testing at major events. This area has improved a lot.
Programme size limits. The Olympic programme caps total athletes and events. Adding a sport often means removing another. The IOC has stayed cautious about expansion, especially after criticism that the Games have grown too large.
Broadcast appeal. The IOC weighs whether a sport will draw TV audiences. BJJ's broadcast reach — FloGrappling, UFC Fight Pass, growing pay-per-view interest — has grown fast. It still lacks the mainstream TV presence judo or wrestling already have.
The LA 2028 organizing committee got the power to add extra sports just for that Games. Breakdancing, flag football, cricket, squash, and baseball/softball all got added this way.
BJJ was not selected. But the process revealed something real: BJJ was actively considered. Advocates connected to both the IBJJF and Abu Dhabi's grappling investment lobbied for it. Getting to serious consideration, instead of being dismissed outright, marks a real shift from where the sport stood a decade ago. The sports that did get picked were chosen partly for American audience appeal. Flag football and baseball made obvious sense for a Los Angeles crowd. BJJ couldn't yet show that same mainstream American broadcast reach.
IOC recognition and Olympic inclusion are different things. A sport can be recognized without being on the programme. As of 2026, BJJ does not have full IOC recognition through one unified federation. That's the main structural barrier — not a question of the sport's quality or global reach.
The path to inclusion runs through four steps: form a single global federation accepted by all major BJJ organizations, get that federation IOC recognition, prove full WADA compliance at the highest level of competition, and run a sustained lobbying campaign backed by real audience data. The first two steps are still incomplete. Anti-doping progress is underway. The lobbying effort still lacks the commercial backing established Olympic sports already have.
Judo has been an Olympic sport since 1964. The comparison is the clearest way to see BJJ's gap.
Judo has one uncontested global authority: the International Judo Federation. No competing body runs major events under different rules. BJJ has three — IBJJF, ADCC, UAEJJF — all running independently. Judo's rules are identical worldwide. BJJ's rules vary by organization: gi versus no-gi formats differ, heel hook legality differs by ruleset, and scoring isn't uniform. The IOC won't include a sport whose own rules are still contested.
Judo also had deep roots in Japan. Government and cultural backing gave it real diplomatic leverage with the IOC. It also had established European and Japanese broadcast history well before its Olympic debut. BJJ's strongest institutional backer — the UAE, through ADCC and UAEJJF — has real resources, but a different geopolitical position. Its broadcast footprint is also newer and more niche. None of these gaps are permanent. Several are actively closing. But together they explain judo's 60-year head start.
If BJJ were ever added, some genuinely hard format decisions would need answers first.
Gi or no-gi? The IOC would almost certainly want one single format. That alone is contentious inside the BJJ community. IBJJF is gi-focused, ADCC is no-gi, and picking one hands that federation's rules the upper hand.
Weight classes. IBJJF's nine divisions per gender would likely need to shrink. Olympic judo runs seven per gender.
Match format. Olympic matches need clear, time-limited outcomes for broadcast. IBJJF's current format lets a match end 0–0 on advantages, which is a tough sell for casual viewers. An Olympic version would likely need overtime or golden-score sudden death.
Points or submission-only? ADCC's submission-only style is genuinely exciting to watch, but harder to referee cleanly. IBJJF's points system referees more easily but looks less dramatic on screen.
None of these have obvious answers yet. They'll need answers before the IOC seriously considers the sport.
Brisbane 2032 is the next Games after LA 2028. It's hosted in Australia — a country with a large, growing BJJ community, especially in Queensland and New South Wales. For BJJ to be seriously in the running, a few things need to happen: a unified global federation needs IOC recognition by roughly 2027–2028, WADA compliance needs full proof at every major event, real audience-growth data needs documenting, and IBJJF and ADCC/UAEJJF need to agree on one competition format. None of that is guaranteed on that timeline. But it's a real, plausible pathway — not wishful thinking.
The sport isn't waiting around. ADCC has become the de facto world championship of no-gi grappling, with real mainstream combat-sports attention. IBJJF Worlds is still the sport's most prestigious gi event. Professional leagues and super-fight promotions have built real prize money and pay-per-view audiences, all without any Olympic backing.
Is any form of "Jiu Jitsu" at the Olympics? No form of jiu-jitsu is currently on the Olympic programme. Sports Ju-Jitsu appears at the World Games, a separate event. But that's a different discipline from BJJ entirely.
Will BJJ be at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics? No. BJJ was considered for the LA 2028 host-city discretionary sports. It was not selected.
Why is judo an Olympic sport but not BJJ? Judo has one unified global governing body and standardized worldwide rules. BJJ is split across IBJJF, ADCC, and UAEJJF, with rules that differ between them. That's a structural gap the IOC has consistently flagged.
BJJ is not an Olympic sport today, and it won't be at the next confirmed Games. But the gap has narrowed a lot over the last decade. Brisbane 2032 is a real, if uncertain, opportunity. It depends on the sport's federations finally agreeing on one house to govern from.
No. BJJ does not appear on the official Olympic Games programme, and it is not part of the currently confirmed LA 2028 lineup. The combat sports on the Olympic programme are boxing, judo, taekwondo, and wrestling.
No. That is Sports Ju-Jitsu, governed by the Ju-Jitsu International Federation (JJIF), which combines striking, throwing, and groundwork under different rules and uniforms than BJJ competition.
It is possible, most plausibly for Brisbane 2032. That would require BJJ's major federations (IBJJF, ADCC, UAEJJF) to unify under one IOC-recognized governing body and agree on a single competition format, which has not happened yet.
Judo has one uncontested global governing body and standardized worldwide rules, plus a decades-long head start in Olympic infrastructure and broadcast history. BJJ is split across IBJJF, ADCC, and UAEJJF with rules that differ between them — a structural gap the IOC has consistently flagged as a barrier.
No. BJJ was considered for the LA 2028 host-city discretionary sports slots alongside additions like flag football and cricket, but it was not selected for the final lineup.
Founder & Editor, BJJ Sportswear
Mohsin has trained Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu for six years at Gracie Barra and has competed at IBJJF-affiliated tournaments. He writes about competition, gear, and athlete careers, and founded BJJ Sportswear to help grapplers find equipment and information they can trust.
This article was last reviewed and updated on 2026-08-18.